Goto

Collaborating Authors

 empirical potential


When More Data Hurts: Optimizing Data Coverage While Mitigating Diversity Induced Underfitting in an Ultra-Fast Machine-Learned Potential

Gibson, Jason B., Janicki, Tesia D., Hire, Ajinkya C., Bishop, Chris, Lane, J. Matthew D., Hennig, Richard G.

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) are becoming an essential tool in materials modeling. However, optimizing the generation of training data used to parameterize the MLIPs remains a significant challenge. This is because MLIPs can fail when encountering local enviroments too different from those present in the training data. The difficulty of determining \textit{a priori} the environments that will be encountered during molecular dynamics (MD) simulation necessitates diverse, high-quality training data. This study investigates how training data diversity affects the performance of MLIPs using the Ultra-Fast Force Field (UF$^3$) to model amorphous silicon nitride. We employ expert and autonomously generated data to create the training data and fit four force-field variants to subsets of the data. Our findings reveal a critical balance in training data diversity: insufficient diversity hinders generalization, while excessive diversity can exceed the MLIP's learning capacity, reducing simulation accuracy. Specifically, we found that the UF$^3$ variant trained on a subset of the training data, in which nitrogen-rich structures were removed, offered vastly better prediction and simulation accuracy than any other variant. By comparing these UF$^3$ variants, we highlight the nuanced requirements for creating accurate MLIPs, emphasizing the importance of application-specific training data to achieve optimal performance in modeling complex material behaviors.


Multi-Fidelity Gaussian Process based Empirical Potential Development for Si:H Nanowires

Kim, Moonseop, Yin, Huayi, Lin, Guang

arXiv.org Machine Learning

In material modeling, the calculation speed using the empirical potentials is fast compared to the first principle calculations, but the results are not as accurate as of the first principle calculations. First principle calculations are accurate but slow and very expensive to calculate. In this work, first, the H-H binding energy and H$_2$-H$_2$ interaction energy are calculated using the first principle calculations which can be applied to the Tersoff empirical potential. Second, the H-H parameters are estimated. After fitting H-H parameters, the mechanical properties are obtained. Finally, to integrate both the low-fidelity empirical potential data and the data from the high-fidelity first-principle calculations, the multi-fidelity Gaussian process regression is employed to predict the H-H binding energy and the H$_2$-H$_2$ interaction energy. Numerical results demonstrate the accuracy of the developed empirical potentials.